Make-up by Mario Maurice Ultra Suede Lipstick ($ 24.00 for 0.14 oz.) Is a deep brown with subtle, warm undertones and a soft, matte finish. The texture felt very light, thin, and didn’t slip on my lips, and in the tube the ball itself was firmer and a little denser, so it took more pressure to apply to my lips and it was less comfortable, more apply fluid movements. It had an opaque pigmentation that wore well for four and a half hours and felt neither drying nor moisturizing.

CONTINUE READING: Formula overview for details on general performance and properties (such as fragrance).

  • NARS Lonely Heart (P, $ 27.00) is cooler (95% similar).
  • Anastasia Rust (P, $ 18.00) is warmer (95% similar).
  • Guerlain # 99 (P, $ 33.00) is shimmery, brighter, shinier (90% similar).
  • NARS Dominatrix (P, $ 26.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
  • NARS Done It Again (P, $ 26.00) is darker (90% similar).
  • KVD Beauty Crucifix (P, $ 20.00) is lighter and cooler (85% similar).
  • Tarte Wannabe (P, $ 20.00) is lighter, warmer (80% similar).

Formula overview

$ 24.00 / 0.14 oz. – $ 171.43 per ounce

The formula is said to be a “comfortable matte” finish that provides “full coverage” that “does not dry” and includes “smoothing gels and texturizing powder” that provides a “smooth, matte, soft appearance”. It’s a silicone heavy formula that’s thin, very light, and has a “soft matte” finish that is mostly matte, but not quite as flat at first as a true matte lipstick.

I find that this type of formula is a more common release from a variety of brands, and they don’t often have a lot of differentiation. Unfortunately, in my experience, most of these formulas have a tendency to highlight lip texture and imperfections – especially to catch dandruff, even slight dryness – and to dissolve into lip wrinkles when worn. The lighter shades tend to apply worst and look worst, while medium and deeper shades can be applied smoother and more flattering.

I noticed that the red and berry tones of the series in the tube seemed stiffer than most of the other hues in the series, and this caused the base of the lipstick to break off the twist mechanism (which broke the following sunglasses: Alicia, Kiana, Kristen, Amanda).

The pigmentation varied from a semi-opaque to an opaque covering power, with lighter shades having a purer covering power compared to deeper shades. The initial consistency was firmer in the tube, though not so severe that I pulled painfully, but I found this tends to provide less pigmentation and tends to be a better application when building shorter, overlapping strokes overall.

The formula didn’t dry out and was very light, making it felt like I had nothing on, but they only wore between two and five hours with some shades exceeding that range (like a red).

Browse all of our Makeup by Mario Ultra Suede Lipstick swatches.

ingredients

Hydrogenated polyisobutene, dimethicone, cetearyl ethylhexanoate, microcrystalline wax (Cera Microcristallina), caprylic / capric triglyceride, polyethylene, SILICA, trimethylolpropane triisostearate, dimethicone / vinyl dimethicone cross polymer, kaolin, synthetic wax, bis-diglyceryl polyacrylic acid (CARNAUBA WAX [CERA CARNAUBA], STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE, POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID, PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-t-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE, PROPYLENE CARBONATE, PINK CANINA FRUIT OIL, PASSIFLORA EDULIS SEED OIL [MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR (+/-): RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090), RED 28 LAKE (CI 45410), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), RED 6 (CI 15850)]

Disclaimer: The ingredient lists are available from the brand (or retailer) at the time of publication. Please always check the product packaging, if any, the applicable ingredients list for the product you purchased, or the brand or retailer website for the most up-to-date list of ingredients.

Make-up by Mario Rasa Ultra Suede lipstick ($ 24.00 for 0.14 oz.) Is a light, lighter pink coral with subtle, warm undertones and a matte finish. The texture was firmer and stiffer in the tube, so it tugged a bit when applied, while the lipstick felt very light (almost like nothing at all) despite its thin thickness.

It had a semi-opaque, buildable paint release that was applied somewhat evenly, but was very prone to getting stuck in my lip lines and clinging to imperfections in lip texture. This shade lasted two and a half hours, felt neither drying nor moisturizing, and had clearly settled over time.

CONTINUE READING: Formula overview for details on general performance and properties (such as fragrance).

  • Tom Ford Beauty Fascinator (P, $ 55.00) is darker, shinier (90% similar).
  • ColourPop Tattle Tail (LE, $ 6.00) is darker and cooler (85% similar).
  • ColourPop Name Drop (P, $ 7.00) is darker and cooler (85% similar).
  • MAC Reverence (P, $ 21.00) is cooler (85% similar).
  • Too Faced Melted Clover II (P, $ 21.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
  • Pat McGrath Divine Rose (P, $ 38.00) is darker, cooler, shinier (85% similar).
  • NARS Anais (LE, $ 34.00) is warmer (85% similar).
  • NARS Walk This Way (P, $ 26.00) is darker and cooler (80% similar).
  • Makeup by Mario Brielle (P, $ 24.00) is darker, warmer (80% similar).
  • Bite Beauty Pomelo (P, $ 28.00) is darker, cooler (80% similar).

Formula overview

$ 24.00 / 0.14 oz. – $ 171.43 per ounce

The formula is said to be a “comfortable matte” finish that provides “full coverage” that “does not dry” and includes “smoothing gels and texturizing powder” that provides a “smooth, matte, soft appearance”. It’s a silicone heavy formula that’s thin, very light, and has a “soft matte” finish that is mostly matte, but not quite as flat at first as a true matte lipstick.

I find that this type of formula is a more common release from a variety of brands, and they don’t often have a lot of differentiation. Unfortunately, in my experience, most of these formulas have a tendency to highlight lip texture and imperfections – especially to catch dandruff, even slight dryness – and to dissolve into lip wrinkles when worn. The lighter shades tend to apply worst and look worst, while medium and deeper shades can be applied smoother and more flattering.

I noticed that the red and berry tones of the series in the tube seemed stiffer than most of the other hues in the series, and this caused the base of the lipstick to break off the twist mechanism (which broke the following sunglasses: Alicia, Kiana, Kristen, Amanda).

The pigmentation varied from a semi-opaque to an opaque covering power, with lighter shades having a purer covering power compared to deeper shades. The initial consistency was firmer in the tube, though not so severe that I pulled painfully, but I found this tends to provide less pigmentation and tends to be a better application when building shorter, overlapping strokes overall.

The formula didn’t dry out and was very light, making it felt like I had nothing on, but they only wore between two and five hours with some shades exceeding that range (like a red).

Browse all of our Makeup by Mario Ultra Suede Lipstick swatches.

ingredients

Hydrogenated polyisobutene, dimethicone, cetearyl ethylhexanoate, microcrystalline wax (Cera Microcristallina), caprylic / caprine triglyceride, dicalcium phosphate, polyethylene, SILICA, trimethylolpropane triisostearate, dimethicone / vinyl dimethicone, 2-acylic polymer, kaolin, synthetic wax, bis-diglyceryl COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX [CERA CARNAUBA], STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE, POLYHYDROXYSTEAR ACID, PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-t-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE, PROPYLENE CARBONATE, PINK CANINA FRUIT OIL, PASSOCLORA EDULIS SEED OIL, [MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR (+/-): IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090)]

Disclaimer: The ingredient lists are available from the brand (or retailer) at the time of publication. Please always check the product packaging, if any, the applicable ingredients list for the product you purchased, or the brand or retailer website for the most up-to-date list of ingredients.